Who We AreI am just a natural birth parent who has been supporting other families campaigning for some years. With being just one of many thousands now in the UK, i realise i have a voice and i need to use it to help ease some of the pain natural parents face when Judges dispense without parent(s) consent to have ones children Forcibly Adopted.
I have been interviewed by Slovakians for Slovakian TV as i understand it along with a few other fellow natural parents, yet i have never to date seen our full interviews available to us. I have been interviewed on blog radio and am about to be again soon. Then more recently, i was interviewed over a 3 part movie. The links to the guy who interviewed me can be found here- http://fplm.org/child-trafficking.html or http://fplm.org/advice--awareness.html and his interview skills are impeciable. Another mother i take my hat off to who succeeded in getting her son home and worked very hard to achieve this, is a lady named Amy Lillian Johnson. Amy still went through a tough time prior to this happening and her only crime was to have fallen from a cliff. Amy's webpage will be being updated shortly and her link can be found here- http://www.unitedpass.co.uk/about/ I am a parent and natural parent who never had phone calls to her children stopped and i knew where they all stayed all but for my eldest son, who remained in my 'full time' care all throughout. At risk of Significant Harm is what was used against me for my natural son. I'm sorry, but if a mum is going to eg rob a jewellery shop who has one child in her care with the other two children staying over, making that one said child when he returns home to live go with her who could risk himself say falling into broken glass then- a mum can potentially do the same with her eldest child at home. It's pure nonsense and hearsay. Yet hearsay is what gets used in Court with fabrications and exaggerations. I do have my local MP's support who has seen my paperwork. Also, i have taken part in research concerning natural parents with a lady named Adele Sanders from the Fassit website called 'Contested Adoption The Social engineering of families. https://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/2012/07/02/new-dissertation-contested-adoption-the-social-engineering-of-families-negotiating-stigma-and-social-exclusion/ |
Our HistoryWhen my natural child was 8 months old, he occurred an injury and it's important to say it was not from me. It was in the local papers and there was no prison sentence, as the Judge described the said injury as not being a deliberate one. This was decided in Magistrates Court and not through secret Family Court. Children's (then known as Social) Services pursued me through Court claiming that the accidental injury was instead a none accidental one. The second long term Social Worker and the Guardian Ad Litem were discovered by the Judge to Fraud on my Case. They were made to rectify matters by means of carrying out their work properly which still resulted in me losing my natural son to Forced Adoption. My Solicitor who saw me through most of the Case failed to represent me properly as her client and, i recently learnt the Legal & Democratic Department of the Council withheld documents from me in 2010 relevant to my Case. This now means i have the option of appealing. Although, Adoption Orders cannot be overturned once they are made. All through my experience i realise anything which happens and especially now, has to be in my natural son's best interests.
In between time i had learnt that the first Long Term Social Worker had planned to have my son adopted no matter what i did. My Solicitor was aware and ensured my written evidence by means of Witness Statements would not get to see the light of day. I suffered a breakdown as a consequence of what had happened to my natural son and seeing Children's Services work in a way to deliberately break my family down. My Case ran at a time when Adoption procedures were not sped up like they are today. Hence, i did not stand a chance at Court and it's fair to say i have suffered an injustice. (Miscarriage Of Justice) The Threshold made out against me stated i was suffering from EUPD. The Judge spotted that there had been no medical expert opinion on the matter. In response to the Threshold, i denied i had EUPD. After intensive CBT Therapy, it transpired i was right but it was too late, that damage was done. Goalposts were moved and swapped about and things which could have been done and achieved to help me in early days were not done. Therefore, it was timescales which let me down in the end. Stretch an elastic band and how far or little can it stretch-As long as is chosen where it concerns Family Law and Courts. At age 12 my natural son had wanted to write to me upon learning of the Adoption. Age 13 he had tried searching for his natural family then finally at age 16 he successfully found me. In 2013, i had applied for a Contact Order to enable face to face contact to take place, this had been due to learning from Children's Services my natural son had been seeking to find me. This got denied at Court whereby i represented myself this time. The Judge concluded i was mistaken and the Case got thrown out of Court yet with a Court Order in my favour. The Judge said, should my natural son search again and find me/contact me either directly or indirectly then a meeting was to take place for both of us with a view to face to face contact. Here is an example from my own Case how Children's Services did not put the best interests of the child first because they fabricated evidence. My videos can be viewed on YouTube under 'Tum Mum Michele Simmons' https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwxi9tDyqs8WmzMf0INqQrg I even had a GP friend who lives locally appear at my house the day of Children's Services visit, who wrote a Witness Statement for me stating what it was Children's Services had said. My natural son and i are currently still in touch through social media and i am awaiting hearing further from Children's Services. My natural child has made it known he would like to see me. I too would like to see him. I hope you are able to substantiate from reading this that yes i have a problem with how unfairly i have been treated by the corrupt system, but not where it concerns my natural son's Adoptive Parent who i believe is putting my natural son's best interests first. |